
Sir,
In order for me to message you on aim when I might be around for awhile would require you to be on aim when I actually am around.
If you insist on only being online and responsive when you are at work, then your request for me to send you messages when you are available is unacceptable since some of us have busy jobs where we can not devote time to instant messaging.
Your attack of the 3,869 question marks was quite unneccessary.
However, since you have neglected to respond to any other form of communication in the past 4 months, and I can only socialize personally with you twice a month at parties, I have no choice but to continue to employee my method of lunchtime brick wall aiming.
Please however, be advised that my lunch time will be changing on Monday, May 2nd, to 12:45p.m. to 1:45p.m., hopefully coincinding with less "Sorry, I ran out for a bit!" but presumably with more "can't talk right now, i'm busy."
Your attention to this matter is highly warranted as it is a time sensitive matter.
Regards,
cj.
ok. now THAT was funny.
Posted by: nathan at April 26, 2005 11:51 PM